Too many distractions.

I have to admit that every experience makes life richer, heavy or joyful, life is always heavier. As to whether or not to thank or resent these experiences, everyone has different views and cannot demand unity.

It's just that life couldn't be simpler. It's nothing more than life and death. It's only after solving the problem of life and death that we have so many desires. This is what the ancients said to be full of warmth and lust! After satisfying the appetite, people's spiritual needs began to increase, and Maslow was detailed enough, but it was not as simple as the so-called hierarchy of needs. These needs always permeate and complement each other. And these needs, what we call desire, unwittingly manipulate our spirit and direct our actions, it doesn't matter whether it's right or wrong, and it just happens.

Because of some setbacks, in view of the need to seek psychological balance, I have had and adhered to the idea for a long time: I want to see through the nature of all these things, and then find a way to face and solve them. As a result, everything seems to be very simple, but what we think is too complicated, often around, and finally we are fascinated by ourselves and forget our original intention.

All the problems in the world seem to have only two results, can be solved and can not be solved. If it can be solved, then how to solve it in the next step, what measures to take, and all methods and measures that do not aim at solving the problem are a waste of time and emotion. If it cannot be solved, then give up decisively. Put aside the emotional factors, everything is much easier to solve. Therefore, sensibility is really not conducive to the solution of the problem.

There seem to be only two answers to the judgment of everything in the world, right and wrong. It is not up to us to decide whether it is right or wrong, we can not change the rules of life, if you can change, the price is to get a lot of trouble, if you want to get rid of these troubles, then do not doubt the rules, play by the rules. The key is that if we are right, we will continue to keep it, and if we are wrong, we will correct it decisively and move in the right direction.

All the questions in the world seem to have two conclusions, yes or no. What can you change? What can you do if it's not you? The key is what kind of answer you need to get, whether you are more determined, not whether you want to give up?

In fact, everything has already been answered, what you need is only a confirmation, what you need is only a reason for you to insist or give up, it doesn't matter whether it's right or wrong, true or false, right or wrong.

Life is always in hope to disappointment, sometimes even to despair, everything depends on your choice, in the face of disappointment how to do? What to do in the face of despair? Nine times out of ten people are unhappy, when can they be proud in their life? In this way, what we have to face in this life is how to deal with unhappiness. In fact, it is nothing more than positive response and negative response. The so-called positive response is not so complicated. Everything that is disadvantageous to you will be discarded. If you can keep what is good for you, keep it. The ultimate goal should be nothing else, but to make the rest of the day as happy as possible, carrying too much will collapse one day. It is better to simplify everything, as one day a boy said to a girl, "would you like to be my girlfriend?" The girl only asked one sentence: what if I promise? what if I don't agree? The boy was speechless and never thought about it. This is a simple conversation between people in ordinary relationships, but why does it fail after putting it on people with different relationships? Everything may come from desire!

No one is selfish, and the guardians are nothing more than fifty steps and a hundred steps. Money falls in the sky, and people who don't get it condemn those who get it from all levels, but they just fail to get it; people who don't own a house condemn speculators simply because they can't afford to buy a house; men who criticize polygamy don't get sour grapes. In a word, biology itself is the law of the jungle and the survival of the fittest, but this simple logic becomes extremely complicated after adding the so-called human nature of jealousy, envy, love and hatred, compassion, goodness, ugliness, and so on. Originally just from the two to choose one of the questions by the respondents themselves into M choose N, why bother to come, just ask for trouble!

In fact, the best life may be simple, simplify all problems, block all the so-called rules, the so-called norms, the so-called right and wrong, I will come next, I will leave, and then there is no joy or sadness. Then it is good to live every moment of the present calmly, after all, every second of the past is fleeting. If you die, you will know that everything is empty. That's what Cai Lan meant when he said, "it's better to live a wayward life." In fact, everything is meaningless, the meaning is just the cage that human beings weave for themselves, put themselves into it cheaply, and then want to break free in pain. It's cruel to say that, but the truth is often so cruel. So the two conversations of the legendary northeasterners may be the closest to the ultimate solution to the problem: what are you looking at? You got a problem? And then we do it. Rough as it is, it is the closest to the essence. Those so-called civilizations, screw him.

In fact, the best life may be to do what needs to be done step by step. Of course, do it if you have the ability, don't ask what it means, it should be done; even if you don't have the ability, there's no need to blame yourself. Other ideas, everything is the shackles that you bind to yourself, everything is the cage you weave for yourself, everything is asking for trouble.

In fact, the best life I do not know, I only know that nothing in mind is the best life!

Left Bank: this article is a bit circuitous, so it is called miscellaneous thoughts. Of course, the end of the choice is either one or the other, that is, choosing what means losing another, such as people either live or die. But if we lengthen the process, we will find that the process is full of possibilities and is in a gray area, such as how many times the earth has been extinct and then reborn since its birth, so repeatedly moving forward, how can it be that there are only two ends of nothing and being, birth and death? This is clearly a process of making something out of nothing and depending on life and death.